SCAM @LIFE

[2.108]

 

Scammers Profile Link: Cracked.st - Profile of life
Sales Thread: ⚡ ⟦ CURSOR UNLIMITED USAGE ⟧ ⚡ | Cracked.st
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: 16$
Screenshots of Communication: https://imgur.com/a/k3Oc5Z6
Additional Information: Hello,
I purchased a Cursor Pro account from this seller to test their reliability. Unfortunately, the product does not match the store description, and I am requesting a full refund due to the following issues:

1. Inaccurate Description: The listing promised "full access," but I did not receive a full-access account. When confronted, the seller gave vague excuses about being blocked.
   
2. Account Banned Immediately: I only logged into a secondary browser once to confirm the Pro status, without using any API features or data. The very next day, I delivered the account to my customer, who found it completely banned (the page loops on an infinite load screen).
   

The seller is falsely claiming that I caused the ban through heavy usage or API calls. Based on the timing, it is highly likely the seller is utilizing the account backend for their own methods, leading to the ban.
Given that the item was defective and did not fulfill the listing's description, I would like to request a full refund.
Thank you for your assistance.
Crypto address for a refund: usdt bep20 :   0xf3F6a23B492Ebf58f1BF702ea5671A4a05E66f95

Join Our Discord: AntMarket

   
 

[1]

System bot message: @life (life) has been notified about this dispute via private messages and has 24hours to reply in this thread

 

Taking care of cracked.sh's leechers. Every day.
If you have a question regarding your leeching level, click here.

[285]

First, the buyer linked the wrong sales thread in their report.
 
Second, regarding the "full access" claim, the buyer was clearly informed during our conversation that I was unable to provide email access due to Stripe declining payments from Gmail and Hotmail addresses, which forced me to use a temporary iCloud email instead. The buyer did not refuse the product, did not request a refund at that point, and continued to ask for verification codes afterward. If the lack of email access was a dealbreaker, the correct action would have been to refuse delivery and request a refund immediately. Accepting the product and continuing to use it means the buyer agreed to the terms as described at delivery. Screenshots of this conversation will be forwarded to the admins.
 
Third, the buyer stated in our chat that the account was "not for me, its for my customer," meaning he is a reseller. This is relevant because it shows the account went through multiple hands.
 
Fourth, and most importantly, the buyer claims he barely used the account and only logged in once to verify Pro status. This is directly contradicted by the evidence. I have email records showing a failed charge of $60.00 for a subscription upgrade attempt and a failed charge of $26.19 for extra API usage on the Visa card ending in 7300 tied to the account. These charges do not happen unless the account reached 100% of its included API usage and then attempted to consume additional credit beyond the plan limit. An account that was "barely used" does not generate overage invoices. The buyer exhausted the full API quota and attempted to use approximately $23 to $26 in extra usage on top of that.
 
Accounts on Cursor are not banned without reason. The most likely causes in this case are the unpaid invoices generated by the buyer's heavy usage and the unauthorized upgrade attempt. The ban is a direct consequence of the buyer's own actions, not anything done on my end.
 
I will be sending the full email history, from account registration to the most recent billing emails, to the admins as proof. All evidence will be provided through DM.
The product was delivered as described under the agreed conditions. The buyer used the account fully, attempted to exceed its limits, tried to upgrade it, and is now falsely blaming me for consequences caused by their own behavior.

[2.108]

Your argument about me being a reseller giving the account to multiple people makes no sense. To log in, a verification code is required directly from you. I am the only one who requested that code and logged in.
 
Regarding the "full access" issue: I accepted the account at the time, but I am bringing it up now to prove my point that you did not deliver what was originally advertised in your description, showing a clear lack of professionalism.

Join Our Discord: AntMarket

   
 

[285]

Your argument about me being a reseller giving the account to multiple people makes no sense. To log in, a verification code is required directly from you. I am the only one who requested that code and logged in.

Once a session is authenticated, cookies can be exported and shared with any number of people without requiring a new verification code. Needing a code to log in does not mean only one person used the account after login. This is basic browser session knowledge.
 

Regarding the "full access" issue: I accepted the account at the time, but I am bringing it up now to prove my point that you did not deliver what was originally advertised in your description, showing a clear lack of professionalism.

Regarding the full access issue, you accepted the product knowing the conditions. You cannot accept delivery, use the account until the API quota is fully exhausted, generate overage charges, attempt an unauthorized subscription upgrade, and then come back later citing the description as leverage. Either the product was acceptable to you or it was not. You made your choice when you accepted it, and you confirmed that choice by proceeding to use it heavily. Bringing up the description now is not a valid argument, it is an attempt to build a case after the fact because your own usage caused consequences you do not want to be held responsible for.

The billing emails showing a $60 failed charge and a $26.19 overage charge are the real evidence here. Those do not appear on an account that was barely touched. Everything else you have said is a distraction from that fact. Full email history from registration to the latest billing notifications will be provided to admins.

[2.108]

[font]okay perfect because i am not behind this usage and i didn't shared any cookie[/font]

Join Our Discord: AntMarket

   
 

[285]

yea sure