https://cracked.st/K3MO https://mailaccess.io/ Airbnb Mail Access SCAM !

[10.007]

I already stated my situation and I will wait for admins answer anyway.

Join Our Telegram: @Coreproxyio
Join Our Discord: Coreproxy

ad by @cheapai expires 4/5

[10.007]

https://cracked.st/Thread-Supreme-My-150...id35053561

acting like a kid won't make you right with your case!

Join Our Telegram: @Coreproxyio
Join Our Discord: Coreproxy

ad by @cheapai expires 4/5

[211]

give my money back scammer ! your accounts are worthless

[3.276]

Upon meticulous examination of your website's Terms of Service (TOS), I discerned that the policy stipulates replacements in particular scenarios: discrepancies in the email address or the absence of the promised product in the email correspondence.
Yet, this stipulation fails to encompass the predicament currently faced by the client. The crux of the matter originates from an impediment to product accessibility, a consequence of exigencies beyond the client's dominion,
notably the requisite of an OTP code from the primordial account proprietor for account emancipation.
 
Does your TOS encompass contingencies for such instances where product accessibility becomes an insurmountable challenge? Moreover, the "SellPass" clause of your
TOS alludes to a predilection for account substitution over the dispensation of refunds, barring exigent circumstances. Nonetheless, an exhaustive perusal of the TOS on your digital platform
does not corroborate the existence of "refunds" or the aforementioned specific terms.
 
The phrase "<Service Name> with Mail Access" ostensibly conveys entitlement to both the service and dominion over the associated electronic mail account.
Contrarily, the client has merely procured access to an electronic mail account affiliated with the service, which, necessitating supplementary multi-factor authentication,
falls short of guaranteeing unimpeded service access. This significant deviation from the implied promise could be construed as a form of surreptitious advertising.
In light of these observations and the conspicuous logical dissonances in your defense, the adjudication unequivocally favors the Original Poster (OP).
 
@K3MO

Provide partial reimbursement to the OP in the amount of 20 dollars.
You have 12 hours in which to do so.

 

 paid ad - 05/15/2026

   [Selling Signature Ad Space - DM Me]

 

[Ping's PGP Key]

Before conducting any form of business confirm my identity through onsite PM.

[10.007]

I really didn't understand that but I will refund anyway and as btc fees are over 30$ now I will ask him for LTC addy

Join Our Telegram: @Coreproxyio
Join Our Discord: Coreproxy

ad by @cheapai expires 4/5

[211]

i paid the same fees for BTC transaction I do not use other than BTC please refund to BTC bc1qdevy9uq4eu5rkhvf4jndestwdjvs49awnes4wr

---

Upon meticulous examination of your website's Terms of Service (TOS), I discerned that the policy stipulates replacements in particular scenarios: discrepancies in the email address or the absence of the promised product in the email correspondence.
Yet, this stipulation fails to encompass the predicament currently faced by the client. The crux of the matter originates from an impediment to product accessibility, a consequence of exigencies beyond the client's dominion,
notably the requisite of an OTP code from the primordial account proprietor for account emancipation.
 
Does your TOS encompass contingencies for such instances where product accessibility becomes an insurmountable challenge? Moreover, the "SellPass" clause of your
TOS alludes to a predilection for account substitution over the dispensation of refunds, barring exigent circumstances. Nonetheless, an exhaustive perusal of the TOS on your digital platform
does not corroborate the existence of "refunds" or the aforementioned specific terms.
 
The phrase "<Service Name> with Mail Access" ostensibly conveys entitlement to both the service and dominion over the associated electronic mail account.
Contrarily, the client has merely procured access to an electronic mail account affiliated with the service, which, necessitating supplementary multi-factor authentication,
falls short of guaranteeing unimpeded service access. This significant deviation from the implied promise could be construed as a form of surreptitious advertising.
In light of these observations and the conspicuous logical dissonances in your defense, the adjudication unequivocally favors the Original Poster (OP).
 
@K3MO

Provide partial reimbursement to the OP in the amount of 20 dollars.
You have 12 hours in which to do so.

Can you tell me why should i get only PARTIAL refund ? I paid 30$ why should i get 20$ ?

[10.007]

OP refused to receive LTC so anyway I refunded via BTC. TXID: 63b2909863726306d55c1ef99db3b857ed39e7bc4242e7e83bdb26615cc04500

Join Our Telegram: @Coreproxyio
Join Our Discord: Coreproxy

ad by @cheapai expires 4/5

[211]

I need the full amount of 30$ refund not partial 20$ why should you keep my 10$ ? For what ????

---

Transaction63b2909863726306d55c1ef99db3b857ed39e7bc4242e7e83bdb26615cc04500
UnconfirmedFirst seen21 minutes agoETAIn ~58 minutesFeaturesSegWitTaprootRBFFee6,720 sat$2.49  The fee was 2,5$ not 30$ as you said .. fcking liar