Why can't c.to make a anti leeching feature

[136]

What if a person has to reply and also like to see the content they usually would have needed to see but they also had to leave a like on it so they could view it
I don't know if there could be many things wrong with this or it's just not possible but I would like to see what other people would think of this

[3.705]

already there the antileechometer exists

[136]

already there the antileechometer exists

I know but what about the post themself maybe they can make the person also have to like the post to view the content

[182]

There already are anti leeching features (see antileechometer and warning levels).
The fact that you only need to reply (and not like, like in other forums) to view the content is something that is made on purpose. Why? Because let's say you unlock some content, but it is outdated or doesn't work or whatever. Then why should the poster receive a like? He shouldn't.

Should the antileechometer be better/more aggressive? Maybe 

New's Services

Autodesk Upgrades | Canva Pro Upgrades | Mango Languages Upgrades | Tableau Licenses
ALWAYS CONFIRM ON-SITE YOU ARE DEALING WITH ME, I NEVER REFUSE MM OR CONFIRMATION VIA PM.

Leeching will get you banned.
Please leave a like  

[3.705]

already there the antileechometer exists

I know but what about the post themself maybe they can make the person also have to like the post to view the content

it makes no sene to force everyone to like then we can already make a automatic like system for it it makes no sense you should obviously not like content that is not good

Check it out Hproxy.com

Wanna advertise your Service for free?
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
t.me/heavensmarketplace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[136]

already there the antileechometer exists

I know but what about the post themself maybe they can make the person also have to like the post to view the content

it makes no sene to force everyone to like then we can already make a automatic like system for it it makes no sense you should obviously not like content that is not good

Ok I guess that makes sense

[3.705]

I know but what about the post themself maybe they can make the person also have to like the post to view the content

it makes no sene to force everyone to like then we can already make a automatic like system for it it makes no sense you should obviously not like content that is not good

Ok I guess that makes sense

XD 

yeah

Check it out Hproxy.com

Wanna advertise your Service for free?
↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓
t.me/heavensmarketplace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[136]

There already are anti leeching features (see antileechometer and warning levels).
The fact that you only need to reply (and not like, like in other forums) to view the content is something that is made on purpose. Why? Because let's say you unlock some content, but it is outdated or doesn't work or whatever. Then why should the poster receive a like? He shouldn't.

Should the antileechometer be better/more aggressive? Maybe 

Wait if you reply to a old post that's by a banned member so you could get the content but you forgot to like will that count as a leech even though the member is banned so there is no point in liking it?