Navigation X
ALERT
Click here to register with a few steps and explore all our cool stuff we have to offer!



   935

Session App: Silent Requests via Reactions

by Talmud - 14 February, 2026 - 07:56 PM
This post is by a banned member (Talmud) - Unhide
Talmud  
Supreme
15
Posts
4
Threads
#1
I've been doing some digging into the Session chat app and came across an interesting behavior. It seems possible to send requests to users without triggering a visible message thread specifically by using reactions and targeting their user ID.

For example, using the Session.js library:
https://sessionjs.github.io/docs/reactions/
Code:
session.addReaction({ messageTimestamp: random-timestamp, messageAuthor: target-session-id, emoji: '?' })
 
Normally, this type of interaction doesn't generate a visible message in the chat UI. However, the client still appears to process it, which makes it a fairly subtle way to interact with a target.

What caught my attention is whether this could be abused. In theory, an attacker could flood a target with these reaction requests, forcing their client to process them continuously. My concern is whether this could lead to a DoS-type situation maybe not on a network level, but potentially crashing or lagging the client itself if enough requests are thrown at it.

That said, I'm not totally convinced this is a serious vulnerability without significant resources behind it. But it still seems worth documenting and discussing.

If anyone here has dug deeper into Session's architecture, explored similar quirks, or has thoughts on whether this could be amplified, feel free to jump in. Always interested in building on these kinds of observations. [Image: hype.png]
This post is by a banned member (Cows) - Unhide
Cows  
Registered
240
Posts
41
Threads
#2
honeypot app
This post is by a banned member (Talmud) - Unhide
Talmud  
Supreme
15
Posts
4
Threads
#3
(14 February, 2026 - 08:03 PM)7all4nt Wrote: Show More
honeypot app

[Image: pepeglad.png]
Let's keep this technical. Dismissing every app as "honeypot" doesn't add anything to the conversation. If you've got actual evidence, bring it. Otherwise, let's stick to the topic.
This post is by a banned member (Cows) - Unhide
Cows  
Registered
240
Posts
41
Threads
#4
(14 February, 2026 - 08:15 PM)Talmud Wrote: Show More
(14 February, 2026 - 08:03 PM)7all4nt Wrote: Show More
honeypot app

[Image: pepeglad.png]
Let's keep this technical. Dismissing every app as "honeypot" doesn't add anything to the conversation. If you've got actual evidence, bring it. Otherwise, let's stick to the topic.

pardon me, ill try to look if I find the article I am talking about
This post is by a banned member (popgoweasle) - Unhide
1
Posts
0
Threads
#5
Still here, pop
Tox F60769EBED486C1CB5629CA30649B384056F7A6B10F0DC66705D46BF64F65333A495779AE30E

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
or
Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)