Scammed by oasis

#18

04 November, 2026 - 07:34 AM (This post was last modified: 04 November, 2026 - 07:56 AM by Bee. Edited 1 time in total. Edit Reason: spacing. )

I was the middleman for this transaction, so I can personally confirm that there was an agreement involving payment for a voice recording. The terms were that Oasis herself had to provide the recording, or the buyer was entitled to a refund. I received the buyer's payment and transferred the money to Oasis, and I have screenshots documenting both transactions. Unfortunately, Oasis did not fulfill the agreement as originally established, and the circumstances surrounding what she provided instead are significantly more concerning than the scam itself.

From what I understand, Oasis hired an underage girl to produce a sexually suggestive voice recording and then sent that recording to an adult male as part of the transaction. What makes this particularly disturbing is that there are screenshots of Oasis herself acknowledging that the person involved was underage. In a group chat, another member questioned the age of the person who made the recording, stating that they did not sound older than 15. Oasis responded with "yea" followed by "underage," and another member subsequently questioned whether the person was younger than 15. There are also messages discussing finding a girl through someone's friend, mentioning that the friend had a sister, and discussing the recording itself. While I cannot independently confirm the girl's exact age from these screenshots, Oasis's own statements establish that she acknowledged the person involved was a minor.

I genuinely do not understand how anyone could think this was acceptable. This was supposed to be a transaction between adults, yet an underage person was allegedly brought into it to create sexualized content for an adult buyer. If Oasis paid a minor to produce that recording and then distributed it, that raises an issue considerably more serious than failing to deliver an agreed-upon service. If a grown man were accused of paying an underage girl to make sexualized recordings for another adult, people would rightfully be outraged. Oasis should be held to the exact same standards, regardless of her gender. Being a woman does not make this behavior any less serious or deserving of consequences, and I believe the administration should investigate it accordingly.

When I went to retrieve the original transaction agreement and chat history to provide evidence, I discovered that Oasis had removed me from the group chat. Because of that, I could no longer export the conversation containing the original terms of the deal, which is incredibly frustrating considering I was the middleman and was specifically asked to provide proof. I cannot say with certainty why she removed me, but the timing is questionable, especially now that the transaction is being disputed. Fortunately, I still have screenshots showing that I received the buyer's payment and forwarded those funds to Oasis. I also have the screenshots concerning the recording and Oasis acknowledging that the person involved was underage. I apologize for not being able to provide the complete original chat history, but I genuinely did not anticipate being removed from the conversation.

I also want to address my own experience with Oasis because I believe it provides relevant context regarding how she has treated me and the accusations she has made. Oasis previously filed a dispute (DD) against me, accusing me of deliberately doxing her, betraying her trust, and intentionally exposing her information. What actually happened was that, back in early September, David contacted me with a Discord username and asked me to run a breach search on it. He told me that the account belonged to someone involved in scamming, and because I regularly conduct digital investigations and searches, I performed the search and sent him the results. At the time, I had absolutely no idea that the username belonged to Oasis. The results contained an old IP address from breach records and, to my knowledge, did not include any passwords or real names. I did not publicly post the results or intentionally target her, and I had no reason to believe the username was associated with someone I knew.

When I eventually found out that the account belonged to Oasis, I explained the situation to her and acknowledged that I should have verified the identity and circumstances more carefully before sharing the information. I took responsibility for that mistake and apologized because I understood why she might be upset, even though none of it was intentional. Apparently, that was not good enough for her, because she continued going into group chats claiming that I had betrayed her, deliberately doxed her, and ruined her life. She repeatedly portrayed me as someone who maliciously exposes people's information, despite knowing that I had already explained what happened and apologized. These accusations affected my reputation and interfered with my ability to earn income through my work, which is particularly frustrating considering how much effort I have put into building my business.

One of the claims she continued making was that she had proof I knew the username belonged to her on October 16. The problem with that argument is that the original search and the information I shared with David occurred in early September, approximately a month and a half before the date she was referencing. Even if she could establish that I recognized the username on October 16, that would not prove I knew whose account it was when I conducted the search weeks earlier. I deal with numerous usernames and investigations, and I cannot reasonably be expected to remember every single username I have searched, especially when I was never informed of the person's identity in the first place. I am not claiming that I handled everything perfectly, and I have already acknowledged that I should have exercised more caution. However, making a mistake without knowing someone's identity is entirely different from deliberately targeting someone with the intention of harming them, and I strongly dispute her characterization of what happened.

Oasis eventually deleted the DD she had filed against me, but deleting the dispute does not erase the accusations she made or the damage they caused. What bothers me most is that she continued treating me like I had committed some calculated act of betrayal, despite the fact that I had no idea the account belonged to her when the search was conducted. She repeatedly insisted that I had done it intentionally and went out of her way to convince other people of that narrative. I had already explained myself, apologized, and accepted responsibility for my actual mistake, yet she continued making accusations that went well beyond what had happened. I do not believe it is reasonable to expect someone to accept responsibility for intentions they never had simply because another person refuses to believe their explanation.

I also find the contrast between these situations extremely concerning. Oasis was willing to file a dispute against me and publicly attack my character over a breach search that I have consistently maintained was unintentional, yet there are now screenshots of her openly acknowledging that an underage person was involved in producing a sexualized recording for a transaction with an adult. I am not bringing up my personal experience simply because I dislike her or because we have previously had disagreements. I am bringing it up because her accusations had consequences for me, and I believe the administration should be aware of the full history. That said, my personal issues with Oasis are separate from the much more serious concerns surrounding this transaction, and I do not want those concerns overshadowed by our disagreement.

Ultimately, the buyer paid for a recording that was supposed to be made by Oasis herself, and the agreement provided for a refund if that condition was not met. I personally handled the payment and can provide evidence that the funds were transferred to her. Based on the information available, the buyer did not receive what he agreed to purchase, and I believe he is entitled to his money back. More importantly, the screenshots raise serious questions about whether Oasis knowingly commissioned and distributed sexualized content involving a minor. Her acknowledgment that the person was underage is documented, and I strongly encourage the administration to investigate the person's age, the payment arrangement, and the circumstances surrounding the recording.

I believe this deserves considerably more attention than an ordinary scam dispute. If the allegations concerning the payment and distribution of sexualized content involving a minor are substantiated, I believe a permanent ban would be entirely justified. Regardless of anyone's personal feelings toward Oasis, there should be no double standard when it comes to the safety of children. Being a woman does not exempt someone from accountability, and an allegation this serious should be investigated thoroughly and handled appropriately.

Sorry for the lengthy message. I've always been extremely vocal about protecting children and other women online, and this is something I take very seriously. I wanted to provide my full side of the situation while emphasizing what I believe is the most concerning part of all of this.

Oasis allegedly hired an underage girl to create sexualized content for an adult man, and there are screenshots of her openly acknowledging that the girl was underage.

Regardless of whatever personal issues I've had with her, my biggest concern here is the involvement of a minor and the fact that someone was allegedly willing to involve a child in something sexual for money. That is something I will never be comfortable overlooking, regardless of who is responsible.

I’m a girl’s girl, but my loyalty to other women will never mean defending a woman who becomes the very monster we’re supposed to be protecting each other from.

Good luck, yall. Thanks for taking the time to read. I hope everything works out. All screenshots I have were provided to @Alex in dms.

OASIS PAID A MINOR FOR SEXUAL CONTENT AND THEN DISTRIBUTED IT TO AN ADULT MAN CLAIMING IT WAS HER [Image: ban2.gif]

#22

04 November, 2026 - 12:41 PM (This post was last modified: 04 November, 2026 - 12:44 PM by Oasis. Edited 1 time in total.)

Any allegation I used any other girl for voice message than me is fake , AR himself said he saw it recording therefore it was done through telegram not uploaded , here is ofifical telegram log last log in was august 7 https://imgur.com/a/CS4krVX , willing to go on call with any admin ect and he can match the voice with the audio while i'm logged in to TG and streaming! @Alex

and regarding the "underage shit" when he shared voice chat in group people in that group think i'm 15 or underage because of my voice therefore they told him https://imgur.com/a/sxUWqJd , https://imgur.com/54ENPML and she tried to twist it lol

Beware of Impersonators!

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy! Register a new account	or	Sign in Already have an account? Sign in here. Sign in now

About Cracked.st

Navigation

Extras

Help

Account