SCAM REPORT AGAINST - https://t.me/VelvetV7

[57]

Scammers Profile Link:  https://cracked.st/VelvetV7
Sales Thread:https://cracked.st/Thread-I-buy-fresh-private-databases-of-the-USA-big-budget
Amount or Item(s) Scammed: database for 80$
Screenshots of Communication: 

Hidden Content

You must register or login to view this content.

chat export
Additional Information:  He gave me a few file tests; I checked all of them. The USA file had 1 hit, and the UK file had 6. I bought the UK file, but it only had 1 hit instead of 6. I sent him a screenshot and wrote that I had mixed up the files and the screenshot showing the 1 hit from the USA file. I informed him about this and showed all the evidence: after checking, there were 6 hits from the UK file — you can see the check time and the actual hits from the test file (all the hits came from there). After checking the full file, the result is only 1 per 10k, instead of 6 per 10k lines, which is 6 times worse. I gave him a video where I log in to these accounts, which proves that these are exactly the entries from his test file, not just random emails. Moreover, he himself admitted in the correspondence that his file is not the same as the test. He provided a good test and a bad full file. He deceived us and doesn’t want to refund the money. Please ban him.
Crypto address for a refund: give in pm

[236]

The screenshots of the communication provided by OP don't load for me, so I am posting the full conversation here:
1. https://ibb.co/RpPtJsL5
2. https://ibb.co/0RLWNCNH
3. https://ibb.co/BKH50V4P
4. https://ibb.co/6797zSKr
5. https://ibb.co/m5Jnt1LG
6. https://ibb.co/93v6NT1g
7. https://ibb.co/d49LRDL6
8. https://ibb.co/GvRJckkN
9. https://ibb.co/r22H0j9q
10. https://ibb.co/6R9cdCZz
11. https://ibb.co/jPhjh7r4
12. https://ibb.co/fdzh2kDm
13. https://ibb.co/Ngn1XYM1
14. https://ibb.co/Pz4pNBs4
15. https://ibb.co/YwXFbWc
16. https://ibb.co/gb8ZVK7s

I will explain the deal step by step so the timeline is clear.

I contacted OP because he was looking to purchase data. At the beginning of the conversation, I asked what target he needed the data for and specifically asked, “It isn’t for mail access, right?” OP did not answer that question. Since he did not specify the intended use, I sent him several different samples and told him to let me know if he liked any of them.

OP specifically liked the UK sample and asked about the price. While discussing the price, I directly asked him how the .uk combo performed and whether the hit rate was good. His response was:

“its data only 1hit, low”

This is important because, at that point, we were specifically discussing the UK sample. There was no mention of 5 or 6 hits. Based on that conversation, we continued negotiating and eventually agreed on $80. OP sent the payment and I delivered the UK data.

After receiving it, OP began checking the data and sending me updates. At first, he sent a screenshot showing that the sample had produced 1 hit while the full data had produced 0 hits after roughly 30k checked, and he said that there “should be 3 hits.”

As more of the file was checked, the results improved. Later screenshots showed the hit rate moving to approximately 1 hit per 10k, which was consistent with what OP himself had originally told me about the sample.

This is where his story suddenly changed.

Once the full file started producing approximately the same hit rate that he had originally described, OP began claiming that the UK sample had actually produced 5 hits from 10k. In the scam report, he has now changed that number again and claims it was 6 hits.

He then claimed that the original “1 hit” he had mentioned was actually from the USA sample and that he had simply mixed up the files.

That explanation does not match the conversation. When we were negotiating specifically for the UK data, I directly asked him how the .uk combo performed and how the hit rate was. His answer was that it had only produced 1 hit and that the rate was low. Only after the full data began showing a similar hit rate did the claim change to 5 hits, and now 6 hits in the report.

After this, OP repeatedly accused me of providing different data from the sample. I deny that accusation. The data I delivered came from the same base/type as the sample I provided.

OP later sent several accounts that he claimed had been obtained from the sample as proof of its quality. I tested those accounts myself. Most of them did not successfully log in, only one appeared to work. When I pointed this out, OP specifically told me to “check the 2nd one,” rather than demonstrating that all of the accounts he provided were valid.

There is also another important point regarding his intended use. At the very beginning, I specifically asked whether the data was going to be used for FA, and OP never answered. He later used the data for that purpose anyway. A large number of the results shown as “locks” in his screenshots are still valid accounts that are locked or protected by 2FA, meaning his own method of checking also affects how he is interpreting the results.

My main point is simple: OP originally described the UK sample as producing approximately 1 hit per 10k. After purchasing the full data and seeing approximately the same rate, he changed his claim and began saying the sample had produced 5 hits, and now 6 hits in the report.

The conversation screenshots show the timeline and the change in his statements clearly. I provided the same type of data that was sampled before the purchase, and I do not believe the evidence presented supports the claim that I scammed him.

[57]

I’ll repeat it to you again: I’m checking many people’s tests, and I can’t immediately see which tests were done where and how many hits they had. I write them down and then tell you roughly about the results. No matter what you write, your test of the database has 6 hits per 10k, while your full database has only 1 hit per 10k. This is 6 times worse, I gave you irrefutable evidence, a screenshot of the receipt from the software, where the number of hits is 6, where the verification time is visible (immediately after you gave the test, 10-15 minutes passed in this screenshot), as well as checking one of these hits (I gave you a video where logged into this account) the rest simply had their password changed. You will not be able to refute this evidence in any way, I am waiting for a refund of all funds or the ban of this scammer.

[5.621]

The evidence provided doesn’t prove that @VelvetV7 intentionally gave different data from the test. Closed.

 

 

Ad by @Hulk | Ends in 19/12